MGM7 Beta-12 Flow Test

Background:

Ongoing development of the MGM7 intake has progressed to printing another model for test fitting and flow testing.

The turbocharger installed in my GTI is driving some changes. For a while, I had been using the Mabotech M520, but then I switched to a prototype that Mabotech is developing, the M720, which uses a substantially different inlet adapter.

Mabotech M520 (L) and M720 (R)
Mabotech M520 (L) and M720 (R)

Looking to the future, I expect to swap over to a Shuenk IS48 turbocharger, which uses a ‘typical‘ inlet, so I am revising the intake design to work with a 3″ turbo inlet elbow.

Shuenk is also going to offer a ported shroud version of the IS48, and the MGM7 intake will also work with this version since I’d like to test the ported shroud.

Shuenk IS48 Ported Shroud Turbocharger
Shuenk IS48 Ported Shroud Turbocharger

Design Changes:

The latest update incorporates an overall curvature, whereas earlier versions, like the Beta-8, had a straight inlet.

MGM7 Intake Beta 12 - Side View
MGM7 Intake Beta 12 – Side View
Beta 8

This change aims to lower the air filter and increase clearance with the hood. Additionally, the centerline radius of the bend is larger, which will help to reduce pressure losses compared with the straighter inlet joining to a tighter bend.

Curvature analysis of the Beta-12 does not show any areas of concern:

MGM7 Intake Beta 12 Curvature Analysis
MGM7 Intake Beta 12 Curvature Analysis

MGM7 Intake Beta 12 Curvature Analysis - Rear Quarter
MGM7 Intake Beta 12 Curvature Analysis – Rear Quarter

MGM7 Intake Beta 12 - Curvature Analysis - Top View
MGM7 Intake Beta 12 – Curvature Analysis – Top View

Along the way to the Beta-12 I also ran an air pressure and velocity check on the Beta-11.

MGM7 Intake Beta 11 - Pressure Analysis
MGM7 Intake Beta 11 – Pressure Analysis

MGM7 Intake Beta 11 - Air Velocity Analysis
MGM7 Intake Beta 11 – Air Velocity Analysis

Flow Testing:

Since the intake is now being designed with a different elbow in mind, I conducted a flow test with the latest Beta, a previous version(9), and a commercial intake (Blaze ATOM) to have information to compare with prior results that used a different inlet elbow.

MGM7 Beta-12 Flow Test
MGM7 Beta-12 Flow Test

The adapter is 3″ in diameter, larger than the adapter used in the last flow test. Because this will allow for increased flow rates, the test pressure was lowered to 16″ of H2O.

The MGM7 Beta-12 flowed 589 CFM @ 16″ of H2O.

Next, the Beta-9 intake was tested.

MGM7 Beta-9 Flow Test
MGM7 Beta-9 Flow Test

It flows 576 CFM @ 16″ of H2O.

The commercial intake is a Blaze ATOM Race.

Blaze ATOM Flow Test
Blaze ATOM Flow Test

Since the ATOM uses a silicone hose in place of the inlet elbow, it is connected directly to the flow bench adapter.

Blaze ATOM Flow Test Result
Blaze ATOM Flow Test Result

The ATOM flows 440 CFM @ 16″ of H2O.

A comparison of these values is shown in the chart below.

MGM7 Intake Beta 12 - Flow Test Summary
MGM7 Intake Beta 12 – Flow Test Summary

Next Steps:

Test fitting will be next. Since the changes with Beta-12 are minor, I expect fitting into the engine compartment won’t be an issue. The focus now is fine-tuning the placement of the filter.